Why British Properties?
Factors
Constant Price Rises
Since
the Second World War, British residential property has increased in
value
every year save the period 1990-3. Since 1996 price increases have
picked
up again. Below graph illustrates price developments since 1969:
As
can be seen from the graph below, this has meant that property prices
have
doubled four times in the course of the last three decades. Overall,
prices
have increased 26-fold.

(Source: Council of Mortgage Lenders)
Lower Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs have fallen dramatically since 1990. The
average homeowner in the UK is currently paying 13.6% of their gross
income to support mortgage payments. Over the last 20 years
households have been paying an average of 21% of their gross income in
mortgage payments. This figure reached a peak of more than 36% in
1990 (Source: Halifax House Price Index for November 2003)..
For mortgage payments to equal the long term average, bank base rates
would have to rise to 6.25% from the current 3.75%. For them to reach
the peak of 36%, bank base rates would need to rise to 10%. (Source:
Halifax House Price Index for November 2003). However, this is highly
unlikely as the current consesus among analysts is that base rates will
end 2004 at a level around 4.25-4.75%. There is thus substantial room
for further price increases on homes before a level similar to that of
1990 is reached.
Fewer New Homes
In
London and other major cities there are - in spite of a chronic
undersupply
of residential property – restrictions in place on the number of new
homes
than can be built on so-called ‘greenfields’. ‘Greenfields’ are sites
that
have not been built upon before. As it is more expensive for builders
to
construct on ‘brownfields’ – land that has previously been built upon –
construction
on these brownfields is considerably slower than similar construction
on
greenfields. This contributes to the current situation where the supply
of
new homes cannot keep up with demand.
The Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) writes that the
number of properties built in 2002 was only 150,000 which was the
lowest level
since the First World War. The figures for London and the South East
show
that new build is providing only about half the number of new
properties
needed. According to the CEBR, the reason for the shortfall is the
inflexible
planning laws which makes it very difficult to obtain building permits.
(Source: Centre for Economic and Business Research, 23rd December 2002
and
19th May 2003). Thus, developers’ holdings of land with planning
permission
have fallen by 32% since 1999. Even with the currently extremely low
rate
of completed sales/homes, there is now only 2.5 years supply of land
with
planning permission held by developers. If housing output were to rise
again
and move towards the sort of levels demanded by both the market and the
government,
say to 1998 levels, there would be just over one year’s supply of land
suitable
for building (Source: FPDSavills on themovechannel.com, 8th September
2003). As it is, “the current, low levels of house building mean that
the average house will have to last around a thousand years before it
is replaced.” Thus, “the markets, and house prices, in the South are
likely to be underpinned by our inability to build enough homes.
Although large tracts of suburbia in southern towns and cities are
generally poorly served by public transport, the sheer imbalance
between supply and demand will add support to values” (Source:
FPDSavills, Residential Newsletter for November 2003).
Halifax Bank plc – one of the largest lenders on the British property
market
– estimate that there will be a cumulative shortage of dwellings of
around
500,000 just in London and the South East by 2021 if current levels of
house-building
are not increased (Source: Halifax national commentary, July 2003).
Pierre
Williams, spokesman for the House Builders Federation, says that
Britain’s
housing under-supply currently continues to worsen rapidly by as much
as
60,000 homes a year or 165 a day (Source: themovechannel.com, 9th June
2003).
The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) report that
the
provision of social housing is now only one-fifth of what it was 20
years
ago. Moreover, the U.K. is lagging far behind the rest of Europe in
terms
of the number of homes available to accommodate its population. The
U.K.
now has an average 10%, or 2.5 million, fewer homes than Germany, Italy
and
France, taking account of population size. (Source: RICS on
themovechannel.com,
21st August 2003)
This very serious shortage of housing puts a severe upward pressure on
U.K.
property prices and is likely to continue doing so for the foreseeable
future.
As Peter Williams, Deputy Director General of the Council of Mortgage
Lenders
(CML), says, "Even a dramatic increase in supply would not completely
prevent
house price surges...". (Source: CML on themovechannel.com, 18th August
2003).
More Singles Want Their Own Home
More and more singles buy their own home. In 2001 40% of the
homebuyers were thus singles compared to 25% in 1983 (Source: Economist
Mark Ellis, Halifax Bank plc, on BBC News 21st August 2002). According
to public statistics about 3.8 million new homes are needed in Britain
over the next 20 years. 80% of these new homes will be intended for
singles, including many singles wishing to rent (Source: Birmingham
Midshires Building Society).
Healthy Rental Market
As property prices are increasing, many people in their
twenties and thirties are delaying their first purchase of a home.
Instead, they are renting, thus providing landlords with a buoyant
rental market. At the same time, these first time buyers ensure that
any downward trend in property prices will not remain for long as they
will use such an opportunity to make their first property purchase. In
this way, they provide a solid underpinning for the prices of smaller
properties.
John Heron is the managing director of Paragon Mortgages, the UK’s
leading specialist buy-to-let lender. He has the following comment
about the U.K. rental market in the June 2003 buy-to-let index from
Paragon Mortgages:
“The rental market is awash with people in their twenties and thirties
who are delaying their first home purchase and going the rental route –
a view that the RICS (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, ed.)
confirmed in their latest Residential Lettings Survey. Canny landlords
are providing more supply to meet this demand.”
In
Paragon’s Buy-to-Let Trends Survey from September 2003 it is reported
that
landlords expect gross yields to remain steady over the next 12 months
at
8.1% and that net yields are forecast to improve from 5.8% to 6.0% in a
year’s
time. Landlords are confident of the future and expect to add on
average
8.2% more property to their property portfolios over the next 12 months.
Paragon furthermore reports that landlords found tenants after an
average
of 3.43 viewings and that the average property remained unoccupied for
only
2.8 weeks per year.
The positive outlook is reflected by a survey carried out amongst the
participants
in the Property Investor Show (Source: themovechannel.com, 4th August
2003):
- 71% of landlords say the shortage of affordable homes for
first
time buyers has boosted the buy-to-let market, as they are choosing to
rent
instead of buying.
-
Hot Spots: Areas seen as giving the highest buy-to-let
returns
over the next 12 months are, respectively Midlands, North West, London
and
the South East.
-
80% of landlords are planning to add to their property
portfolio
over the next 12 months. None are intending to sell any part of their
portfolio.
-
53% of landlords believe the buy-to-let market will grow
over the next 12 months. 21% believe it will remain stable.
Nick Clark, Director of the Property Investor Show comments:
"Our survey confirms landlords are enjoying buoyant times. With low
interest
rates and the surge in tenant demand from young individuals delaying
their
first home purchase, landlords have never had it so good."
Limited Sensitivity to Economic Cycles
According
to the property market analysts Hometrack, British property prices
developed
as follows during the twelve months from August 2001 to July 2002:

(Source: Hometrack market report, July 2002)
As can be seen from this, the terrorist attack on 11th
September 2001 only caused a temporary slowdown in the price rises. The
considerable price rises that have occurred since February 2001 have –
paradoxically – been caused in part by the lower interest rates that
followed in the wake of the attacks on 11th September.
This shows the resilience of the property market: in case of
an
economic downturn (lasting a few years), low interest rates will
underpin
property demand whereas periods of economic growth will increase
employment
and thus strengthen demand for residential property. The property
market
is, in other words, supported not only during periods of economic
growth
but also during economic downturns.
Safer Than Shares
The
abovementioned insensitivity to economic downturns is also illustrated
by
the fact that homes have historically been a much better investment
than
shares, particularly during the recent downturn of the stock markets.
This
can be seen in the following graph, where the development in British
property
prices since 2000 is compared with that of the British stock market
index
FTSE:

(Sources: National Statistics, HM Land Registry)
Looking at the stock and property markets over the long term,
the trend is even clearer:

(Sources: Council of Mortgage Lenders, HM Land Registry, National
Statistics)
Although
the stock market has outperformed the property market in certain
shorter
periods, the property market has thus been by far the best investment
in
the long run.
More Profitable than Fixed Interest Securities
Fixed
interest securities, too, suffer from lacking behind the yield of
properties
in spite of the fact that the security offered by properties is not
much
different from that offered by bonds and other fixed interest
securities.
Below graph shows how the yield on properties – with the exception of
the
atypical period 1990-6 – has generally been above the yield available
by
placing funds in Certificates of Deposit. The property yield has thus
been
above that of fixed interest securities in nine out of the fifteen
years
preceding 1990 and in more than half of the observed period from 1975
to
2001. The property yield for 2002 exceeded the bond yield many times
over
and 2003 also looks more than likely to produce a property yield far
exceeding
that available on bonds and other fixed interest securities.

(Sources: National Statistics, Council of Mortgage Lenders, HM Land
Registry)
Reduced But Continued Price Rises
The above and other factors mean that the upward pressure on
the
property prices is expected to continue, although it is unlikely that
the
rate at which prices have risen over the last couple of years can be
maintained.
Conversely, it will also be unlikely that prices fall over time. There
is
thus extensive consensus among analysts that the question is by how
much
property prices will increase over time, not whether property prices
will
rise or fall.
Consequently, an increasing number of investors choose the
property
market over the stock and bond markets. In October 2000, just 8 per
cent
of the total number of properties sold were to investors, whereas in
August
2003 the figure had risen to 13 per cent (Source: Survey from Royal
Institute
of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), September 2003).
The Secret of Property Investments
The
above figures show that it is possible - even without mortgage
financing
– to obtain yields on property investments exceeding those available on
shares
and fixed interest securities. Historically, however, it has often been
attractive
to finance investments in both property and shares from external
sources.
The decisive difference between the two is that the interests on a
mortgage
used to finance a property investment will usually be covered by the
rental
income, whereas the interests on a loan used to finance share
investments
will not necessarily be covered by dividends or rising share prices.
A
property purchase where the external financing amounts to 75% of the
property
value will thus give a yield on the 25% equity four times as high as
the
rise in the property value, provided that the rental income fully
covers
the financing and operating costs. An annual price rise of 10% will
thus
return a yield of 40% annually. This can be illustrated as follows:
|
Buyer invests
|
£ 25,000
|
|
Buy takes out mortgage for
|
£ 75,000
|
|
Property is purchased for
|
£ 100,000
|
|
|
|
|
Property value increases in one year by
|
£ 10,000 (10%)
|
|
Less mortgage interest and operating costs
|
£ -6,000
|
|
Plus rental income
|
£ 6,000
|
|
Annual profit
|
£ 10,000
|
|
|
|
|
Annual profit as % of initial investment (10,000 /
25,000)
|
40%
|
The above is obviously a very simplified example. See more
detailed calculations here.
As can be seen from the sections further above an investment
in
U.K. residential property is rather safe. Even so, it quite clearly has
a considerable
profit potential, too.
|